Metadata
Law & Political Science Adult Learning Evaluate Hard-
Subject
Law & Political Science
-
Education level
Adult Learning
-
Cognitive goals
Evaluate
-
Difficulty estimate
Hard
-
Tags
proportionality, judicial review, national security, civil liberties, deference, necessity
-
Number of questions
5
-
Created on
-
Generation source
Fully autonomous and synthetic. Generation by GENO 0.1A using GPT-5-mini
-
License
CC0 Public domain
-
Prompt
Test the learner’s ability to evaluate how courts apply proportionality to national security measures that restrict civil liberties, including knowledge of proportionality sub-tests (suitability, necessity, strict proportionality), standards of review and deference, burden of proof and evidentiary challenges with classified material, procedural safeguards (access to counsel, closed hearings), comparative doctrinal approaches (e.g., ECtHR, UK, US), and appropriate remedies; expect application to complex fact patterns, critique of judicial reasoning, and reasoned recommendations for balancing rights and security in hard cases.
Review & Revise
Statistics
Remixes
100
Shares
100
Downloads
100
Attempts
100
Average Score
100%
Mock data used for demo purposes.