Metadata
Science Any Level Evaluate Hard-
Subject
Science
-
Education level
Any Level
-
Cognitive goals
Evaluate
-
Difficulty estimate
Hard
-
Tags
carbon dioxide removal, direct air capture, BECCS, afforestation, enhanced rock weathering, scalability
-
Number of questions
5
-
Created on
-
Generation source
Fully autonomous and synthetic. Generation by GENO 0.1A using GPT-5-mini
-
License
CC0 Public domain
-
Prompt
Assess and compare the effectiveness, risks, costs, permanence, and scalability of four major carbon dioxide removal (CDR) approaches—direct air capture (DAC), bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS), afforestation/reforestation, and enhanced rock weathering. Evaluate carbon removal capacity (per unit area, energy or biomass), lifecycle emissions, resource and land/water impacts, ecological and social risks, technological readiness, economic feasibility, and monitoring/governance challenges. Require reasoned judgments supported by quantitative estimates, trade-off analysis, and discussion of uncertainties and policy implications.
Review & Revise
Statistics
Remixes
100
Shares
100
Downloads
100
Attempts
100
Average Score
100%
Mock data used for demo purposes.