Assess students' ability to apply Supreme Court student‑speech doctrines (Tinker substantial‑disruption test, Bethel lewdness standard, Hazelwood curricular control) to public‑school hypotheticals: identify which precedent governs, analyze whether the speech is constitutionally protected or subject to regulation, and justify conclusions with doctrinal reasoning and balancing of student rights and school interests. Designed for grades 9–12, medium difficulty, focus on practical legal application and written explanation.