Assess graduate students' ability to apply proportionality and necessity tests in constitutional review of counterterrorism legislation by identifying affected rights, evaluating suitability, necessity (least-restrictive-means), and proportionality in the narrow sense, scrutinizing legislative justification and evidence, considering margin of appreciation and emergency powers, and proposing less rights-intrusive alternatives across factual hypotheticals (surveillance, preventive detention, designation powers, restrictions on speech and movement); require reasoned conclusions and citations to doctrinal standards.