Assess educators' ability to analyze and critique rhetorical strategies, discourse structure, and audience adaptation in persuasive grant proposals. Tasks include identifying and evaluating ethos/pathos/logos and argument moves across sections (need, objectives, methodology, budget justification), diagnosing coherence, cohesion, and genre conventions, detecting mismatches with funder priorities and audience expectations, and proposing targeted, evidence-based revisions to increase persuasiveness and alignment; includes short analyses of excerpts, comparative evaluation of drafts, and brief revision plans grounded in audience profiling.