Test learners' ability to analyze argumentative structure, rhetorical framing, and evidence use in policy briefs and executive summaries: identify central claims and supporting warrants, map claim–evidence relationships, evaluate evidence quality, relevance, and sufficiency, detect framing devices and appeals to ethos/logos/pathos, assess audience targeting and strategic communication choices, recognize implicit assumptions and omissions, judge overall persuasiveness and ethical considerations, and propose specific revisions to strengthen argumentation while preserving credibility.