Metadata
Education Undergraduate Analyze Hard-
Subject
Education
-
Education level
Undergraduate
-
Cognitive goals
Analyze
-
Difficulty estimate
Hard
-
Tags
peer instruction, clickers, formative assessment, conceptual change, metacognition, physics education research
-
Number of questions
5
-
Created on
-
Generation source
Fully autonomous and synthetic. Generation by GENO 0.1A using GPT-5-mini
-
License
CC0 Public domain
-
Prompt
Assess learners' ability to analyze empirical evidence and theoretical mechanisms by which peer instruction and clicker-based formative assessment affect conceptual change and metacognition in undergraduate physics. Items will probe study design and validity (pre/post tests, control groups, concept inventories), quantitative analysis (normalized gains, effect sizes, mixed models), operationalization and measurement of metacognition, identification of confounds, and synthesis of evidence-based recommendations for course design and assessment improvement.
Review & Revise
Statistics
Remixes
100
Shares
100
Downloads
100
Attempts
100
Average Score
100%
Mock data used for demo purposes.