Assess graduate students’ ability to draft a model constitutional amendment and an enabling statute to regulate government mass digital surveillance. Require clear legal definitions (e.g., mass vs. targeted surveillance, metadata), constitutional guarantees (privacy, due process), statutory safeguards (warrants, minimization, retention limits, transparency, redress), independent and judicial oversight mechanisms, emergency exceptions with sunset/review, enforcement and remedies, and explicit compliance with international human-rights obligations (e.g., ICCPR/ECHR). Deliverables: amendment text, key statutory provisions, legislative findings, transitional rules, and a concise memorandum justifying choices, proportionality analysis, and implementation considerations. Evaluate drafting precision, doctrinal coherence, and treaty-compatibility reasoning.