Assess students' ability to apply First Amendment free-speech doctrines to university campus disputes. Given short fact patterns (e.g., speaker disinvitations, protests, student discipline, student-group recognition), learners must identify forum status (traditional, designated, limited, nonpublic), distinguish content-based vs. content-neutral rules, apply tests (Tinker substantial disruption, time/place/manner, O'Brien, viewpoint neutrality, heckler's veto), and recommend constitutionally consistent remedies grounded in precedent.