Assess students' ability to apply the Chevron two-step framework to administrative agency rulemaking disputes: determine whether statutory language is unambiguous (Step 1), evaluate whether an agency's interpretation is reasonable and entitled to deference (Step 2), and consider limiting doctrines (e.g., major questions, nondelegation, Auer). Students should analyze short hypotheticals, cite relevant interpretive tools (text, structure, purpose, legislative history), weigh precedent, and draft a concise judicial memorandum resolving the dispute and defending the chosen standard of review. Scope: undergraduate administrative law, medium difficulty, application-focused.