Assess students' ability to draft a model constitutional amendment and implementing federal statute to regulate AI-driven risk‑assessment tools in criminal sentencing. Require (a) proposed amendment text and statutory provisions establishing oversight bodies, transparency and data‑access rules, due‑process protections (notice, explanation, rebuttal, counsel access), evidentiary standards, remedies, audits, and sunset/review clauses; and (b) a strategic litigation plan addressing standing, constitutional claims, federalism/preemption, remedies, enforcement mechanisms, and implementation feasibility. Evaluate doctrinal coherence, constitutional compatibility, and practical enforceability.